Spontaneous pregnancy after bilateral total salpingectomy: a systematic review of the literature

0


[ad_1]

  • 1

    The United Nations. Use of contraception by method 2019. 2019.

  • 2

    Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughesa JM, et al. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: results of the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996; 174 (4): 1161-1170.

  • 3

    Clark NV, Endicott SP, Jorgensen EM et al. Review of sterilization techniques and clinical updates. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2018; 25 (7): 1157-1164.

  • 4

    Creinin MD, Zite N. Female Tubal Sterilization: Now is the time to systematically consider ablation. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 124 (3): 596-599.

  • 5

    Falconer H, Yin L, Grönberg H, Altman D. Risk of ovarian cancer after salpingectomy: a national population-based study. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2015; 107 (2).

  • 6

    Society of Gynecological Oncology (SGO). Clinical Practice Statement: Salpingectomy for Ovarian Cancer. 2013.

  • 7

    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee Opinion # 774: Opportunistic Salpingectomy as a Prevention Strategy for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Obstet Gyneco. 2019; 133 (4): e279-e284.

  • 8

    The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RANZCOG). Female sterilization by Filshie tubal clip occlusion. 2014.

  • 9

    Dilley SE, Straughn Jr JM, Leath III CA. The evolution and evidence of opportunistic salpingectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 130 (4): 814-824.

  • ten

    Adelman MR, Dassel MW, Sharp HT. Management of complications encountered with Essure hysteroscopic sterilization: a systematic review. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2014; 21 (5): 733-743.

  • 11

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of studies evaluating health care interventions: explanation and development. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009; 62 (10): e1-e34.

  • 12

    National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). PROSPERO Prospective international register of systematic reviews. PROSPERO (york.ac.uk).

  • 13
    Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI CRITICAL ASSESSMENT TOOLS. 2020. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools.
  • 14

    Bang A. Pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy. Ugeskrift for laeger. 2008; 170 (17): 1437-1438.

  • 15

    Wang JS, Liang YC, Chen CM. Spontaneous pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy due to tubo-ovarian abscess – a case report. TSMH Medical and Nursing Journal. 2008; 14 (1): 57-60.

  • 16

    Bollapragada SS, Bandyopadhyay S, Serle E, Baird C. Spontaneous pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83 (3): 767-768.

  • 17

    Kahyaoglu S, Yeral I, Artar I, et al. Viable spontaneous intrauterine twin pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 159 (1): 232-233.

  • 18

    Kim AJ, Barberio A, Berens P, et al. The trend, feasibility and safety of salpingectomy as a form of permanent sterilization. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2019; 26 (7): 1363-1368.

  • 19

    McAlpine JN, Hanley GE, Woo MM et al. Opportunistic salpingectomy: adoption, risks and complications of a regional ovarian cancer prevention initiative. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 210 (5): 471. e471-471. e411.

  • 20

    Powell CB, Alabaster A, Simmons S, et al. Salpingectomy for sterilization: change of practice in a large integrated health system, 2011-2016. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017; 130 (5): 961-967.

  • 21

    Shao EX, Hopper K, McKnoulty M, Kothari A. A systematic review of ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2018; 141 (2): 159-165.

  • 22

    OuYang Z, Yin Q, Wu J, Zhong B, Zhang M, Li F. Ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization after bilateral salpingectomy: a review of the literature. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2020.

  • 23

    Date SV, Rokade J, Mule V, Dandapannavar S. Failure of female sterilization: a decade review and its clinicopathologic correlation. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research. 2014; 4 (2): 81.

  • 24

    Roeckner JT, Sawangkum P, Sanchez-Ramos L, Duncan JR. Salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gyneco. 2020; 135 (3): 550-557.

  • 25

    Mills K, Marchand G, Sainz K, et al. Salpingectomy versus tubal ligation for sterilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020.

  • 26

    Westberg J, Scott F, Creinin MD. Safety results of female sterilization by salpingectomy and tubal occlusion. Contraception. 2017; 95 (5): 505-508.

  • 27

    Tai RM, Choi SK, Coyte PC. The cost-effectiveness of salpingectomies for family planning in preventing ovarian cancer. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Canada. 2018; 40 (3): 317-327.

  • 28

    Kwon JS, McAlpine JN, Hanley GE et al. Costs and benefits of opportunistic salpingectomy as an ovarian cancer prevention strategy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015; 125 (2): 338-345.

  • 29

    van Lieshout LA, MP for Steenbeek, Judge De Hullu, et al. Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019 (8).

  • 30

    Mohamed AA, Yosef AH, James C, Al-Hussaini TK, Bedaiwy MA, Amer SAK. Ovarian reserve after salpingectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta obstetricia and gynecologica Scandinavica. 2017; 96 (7): 795-803.

  • 31

    Schmidt JE, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Jeng G, Peterson HB, UCRoSW Group. Asking for information and achieving reversal after tubal sterilization: findings from the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Fertility and sterility. 2000; 74 (5): 892-898.

  • 32

    Piazza A, Schwirian K, Scott F, Wilson MD, Zite NB, Creinin MD. Women’s preference for permanent contraception and willingness to be randomized to a hypothetical trial. Contraception. 2019; 99 (1): 56-60.

  • 33

    AM “Miracle Baby”: A woman becomes pregnant after having her fallopian tubes removed. MedicalXpress. 2019.

  • 34

    Khandaker S, Chitkara P, Cochran E, Cutler J. An ovarian pregnancy in a patient with a history of bilateral salpingectomies: a rare case. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 2015: 740376.

  • 35

    Joosoph J, Siow A. Tubal ectopic pregnancy after bilateral salphingectomies. Singapore Medical Journal. 2007; 48 (8): 787-788.

  • 36

    Attanayake K, Perera G, Weerakkody T, Srisubakaran S. Tubal ectopic pregnancy after bilateral salphingectomy for previous ectopic pregnancies-A case report. Article presented at: AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY2017.

  • 37

    Sangal P, Kotwal H. Unusual presentation of a third tubal pregnancy. A case report. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 1987; 32 (4): 320-321.

  • 38
    National Institute of Health. ClinicalTrials.gov SALpingectomy for STERilization (SALSTER) (SALSTER). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03860805
  • [ad_2]

    Leave A Reply

    Your email address will not be published.